Friday, April 15, 2016

Fatal Road Accidents

In India about two lakh people die in road accidents every year. Major causes of road accidents are over speeding, faulty road engineering, drunken driving, over loading, driving in wrong direction etc.  But whatever may be the cause of accident fatality in an accident is due to high speed. It is only the high speed due to which an accident becomes fatal.

We have laws in our country which governs speed limit for different types of vehicles as per type of road on which the vehicle is plying. Like in a city speed limit for two wheelers is usually 40kph and for four wheelers it is 60 kph. On highways this limit increases, like for cars etc. it goes up to 90 kph.

The enforcement of prescribed speed limit lies with police department. We can find traffic police within city limits with radar guns checking speed of various vehicles plying on the road. Over speeding drivers are often challaned. But we rarely see such checking on highways. Most of the fatal accidents occur at highways. Due to improved road conditions on majority of highways and technological advancements in automobile engineering the speed of vehicles is phenomenal these days which in turn has increased the risks of fatal accidents manifold.

So what’s the way out? Increasing more policemen on highways exclusively for this task checking day and night? Well ideally we should do it but looking at the size of our country and the enormous length of highways it is not a very practical or a feasible solution. My point is when maximum prescribed speed limit for a vehicle as per law is 90kph then why should a vehicle move beyond that limit anytime. Why can’t we make a law binding automobile manufacturers to make such vehicles which can’t move faster than prescribed speed limit?

Such a law can reduce fatality in an accident tremendously. If max. Speed limit for a two wheeler is 40 kph then it should not go beyond this limit at any condition. These days youngsters are in a habit of driving motor cycles on very high speed which is dangerous not only for them but others also who are using roads. Some bikes can even go up to 250 kph. What is the point in allowing such bikes to move on roads? For cars etc. it can be 90kph for heavy vehicles it can be 40-50kph. With such type of vehicles accidents would be much less fatal than present scenario. Also manufacturers should also be bound by law for limiting the acceleration of vehicles. What useful purpose does the acceleration of the kind 0- 100 in 3 seconds types solve? Apart from being less fatal there would be other benefits as well. Like reduction in cost of vehicle as less powerful engines would be required. Less fuel consumption as lesser power is required to cruise the vehicle which in turn means less pollution. Recently honourable Supreme Court of India has banned registration of vehicles more than 2000cc in Delhi. By making such automobiles true spirit of apex court judgement would be followed.


Apart from saving precious human life we would also be making a great contribution towards clean environment. Only drawback would be the commuting time would increase but it is nothing in comparison to safe travelling. Also it would be against business interests of powerful automobile lobby which would exert great pressure on govt. But it is for the govt. to take a call. I think a human life and a clean environment should be on topmost priority for any Nation.

Saturday, June 6, 2015

Maggi Controversy

Maggi controversy
It’s good that quality consciousness has arrived in our  in area of edibles. Huge uproar in media regarding harmful ingredients in Maggi resulting into ban order by govt. of India. But there are certain fundamental questions which need to be answered-
-      -   Do we have comprehensive laws related to safety standards of edibles in our country?
-     -    Do we have adequate infrastructure to enforce such standards?
-       -  Is our legal system competent enough to punish defaulters in a reasonable time?
-     -    Is the punishment or fine adequate to act as a deterrence so as to stop reoccurrence of such events?

Now after banning Maggi can we have a guarantee by govt. that no product more harmful than Maggi is being sold in the country? If answer to it is no then why only Maggi? Do we have enough food inspectors in the country which regularly take samples of all edibles throughout the country? Do we have adequate testing laboratories where such samples can be checked on a regular basis? Do such laboratories follow standard operating procedures for testing?  Maggi is a product which is not consumed by majority of the population but what about milk which is consumed by majority of the population on daily basis. It is well known fact that to get pure milk in our country is very rare. But has govt done anything about it. Everyone knows about harmful chemicals used to ripen the fruits openly but nothing is being done. Vegetables irrigated with sewerage water are a known fact but nothing is being done. How many cases of food adulteration are registered in the country and of those how many  actually result into conviction. During festival seasons everyone is aware about the quality of sweets made and the type of raw material used for them but rarely do we see any action from govt. Even spurious lifesaving drugs are quite common. What about testing and standards laid for packaged drinking water? Is water supplied by municipalities upto the mark?

So by banning Maggi is problem of food safety solved? Govt should seriously think about these issues and invest heavily in this sector rather than working for populist measures for votes (which rarely get converted into actual votes otherwise a ruling party would never had lost any election)



Friday, February 18, 2011

first post

hi,
this is my first post on this blog. i intend to post my thoughts on it which may or may not be logical....